|
Corn Belt land continues skyward, but slows pace |
|
|
|
|
Written by stevefairchild
|
|
Thursday, 17 May 2012 13:52 |
|
Over at the Chicago Federal Reserve, economist David B. Oppedahl reports that the Fed’s District 7 (see map) ag land values were 19 percent higher in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011, a slowdown compared to year-over-year increases of the past three quarters.
“Farmland values in Iowa continued to lead the pack, with a year-over-year increase of 27 percent. On a year-over-year basis, “good” agricultural land values in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin were up 20 percent, 15 percent, 7 percent, and 13 percent, respectively.”
Oppendal said bidding among farmers was common at farmland auctions, driving up winning bids. There were scattered reports of auctions where a reserve price was not met.
Farmers are doing the majority of the buying. According to Oppendahl, “Relative to investors, farmers again purchased a higher share of the acres sold in the past three to six months, although investors were actively searching for properties across the district. Forty percent of the survey respondents observed a higher share of land purchased by farmers versus investors, while 7 percent observed a lower share, in the period from October 2011 through March 2012. The demand to purchase farmland over this period was markedly higher compared with the October 2010 through March 2011 period: Indeed, 74 percent of the bankers reported higher demand to purchase farmland, and just 1 percent observed lower demand. The increase in the amount of farmland up for sale over the winter and early spring relative to a year ago was more pronounced, as 46 percent of the respondents noted more farmland was up for sale in their areas and 13 percent noted less. Similar percentages supported the view that the number of farms sold and their acreage were higher than a year ago as well. The current farm real estate climate seemed to encourage additional properties to be offered for sale, as owners hoped to cash in on recent gains. Farmland cash rental rates in 2012 climbed 17 percent from 2011 for the district—the second-largest increase in the history of the survey. Cash rental rates for agricultural land went up 15 percent in Illinois, 15 percent in Indiana, 20 percent in Iowa, 12 percent in Michigan, and 19 percent in Wisconsin.”
More from the Chicago Fed: http://www.chicagofed.org |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 May 2012 14:13 |
|
|
Written by TF staff
|
|
Thursday, 29 March 2012 20:48 |
|
Establishing a timber tax basis can save you money
Larry Godsey, an economist with the Center for Agroforestry at the University of Missouri, has a question about your timber stand: “What is your basis?”
If you scratch your head rather than answer right away, you’re not alone. A lot of woodland owners don’t know, and that means they could be selling their timber for too little, and paying too much in taxes.
Put simply, the basis, also known as the tax basis, is what you invested in an asset. “Basically, it’s what you paid for it or its fair market value on the day it was acquired,” Godsey said.
While many woodland owners probably have the basis for their entire property—which might include cropland and buildings as well as forest—they may not have established what portion of the original purchase price went to acquiring the timber.
Timber is usually taxed as a long-term capital gain, so you can subtract the cost basis when figuring your tax liability. But if you don’t have the basis, you have to pay tax on the full amount of the sale.
Flooding and tornadoes took out a lot of trees in 2011, and you can declare those trees as a casualty loss-but again, only if you have a basis.
It’s possible to establish a cost basis retroactively by hiring a forester to cruise the timber and “ungrow” the trees, but that can be expensive.
“When you acquire the property, hire a consulting forester to estimate the volume and value of your timber,” Godsey said. You can adjust your basis to reflect additional investments—including the forester’s fee.
If you have inherited the woodland, and therefore didn’t pay anything at all to acquire your timber, you can still establish a cost basis using the appraised market value of the timber, he said.
For more information about timber and taxes, Godsey recommends Internal Revenue Service publication 225, Farmer’s Tax Guide, available at www.irs.gov/publications/p225/. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 May 2012 14:21 |
|
Written by Steve Fairchild
|
|
Wednesday, 02 May 2012 00:31 |
“Pink slime” and raw milk claim victims of different kinds
You are sure to have heard of the controversy surrounding lean finely textured beef. The product came to be labeled “pink slime” in March as media outlets highlighted the practice of harvesting beef from fat trimmings using ammonia gas as a way to raise the product’s pH enough to kill off bacteria.
The media reports told consumers that the beef product was blended into vast amounts of ground beef for sale in supermarkets around the country. In the weeks that followed, major wholesale ground beef buyers said they would stop accepting ground beef with lean finely textured beef as a component. Some later relented on that promise, as the beef industry rallied to explain how common ammonia-treated products are in various food preparation systems. Regardless of the long-term outcome of the controversy, consumer confidence in the food chain was shaken yet again. This story, like so many sensational stories about food, grew from a simple foundational truth: consumers don’t know much about where their food comes from but reserve the right to be surprised and overwrought when they learn more.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 May 2012 14:20 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Dr. Jason Weirich
|
|
Tuesday, 01 May 2012 22:48 |
|
Scouting fields for weeds, disease and insects is one of the best investments you can make to maximize profits. We can expect to see more pests in our crops this year. The mild winter gives concern to the increased insect and weed pressure. I hope you consider evaluating every field in May—and I don’t mean the “windshield” scouting. Make sure evaluations are done thoroughly, it is a bottom-line consideration.
1. Be proactive. A lot of information is available on the Web. It isn’t always the case, but you can often follow in-season situations occurring south of you and know these issues might be heading your way.
2. Know the weather conditions. Mother nature can influence when weeds emerge, disease is present or insects arrive.
3. Be thorough. The standard pattern for walking your field is a W. While you won’t walk every acre, this pattern will allow you to get a uniform sample from across your field. Be consistent in sampling methods. I like to see a sample point for every 2 to 4 acres.
4. Keep good records. These records can help you make a prescription for your field. The notes will also help you make decisions next year. Before evaluating a field, know field history, cropping history, crop rotation, yield potential, pesticide application type, rate and history, variety/hybrid planted, planting date, planting rate, row width, tillage system, tillage timing, seed treatments, weather patterns, fertilizer and lime rates, previous pest problems, and other agronomic factors.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 May 2012 14:21 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Dr. Jim White, MFA Incorporated ruminant nutritionist
|
|
Wednesday, 02 May 2012 18:52 |
|
TF WEB EXCLUSIVE

Forage selection should be based on horse needs, as there is no one forage best suited for all classes of horses. For example, providing a nutrient-dense forage such as vegetative alfalfa hay to a mature horse under limited activity would overfeed energy and protein. However, that same hay would be a good option for a performance horse with elevated nutrient requirements. With so many forages available, how do you choose the right one? As always, cost is an issue, but other differences come into play as well. You can select for superior forage traits. To head down that path, remember that differences in the nutritive quality of forages are largely determined by two factors: plant maturity and species.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 May 2012 14:58 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |