The little things count


importantDatesWhen is the last time you sat down with your crop insurance agent and discussed your policy in detail? Regretfully, the answer is likely to be seldom or never. This could leave bushels on the table when it comes to your Actual Production History (APH). For spring 2023, here are some important endorsements to consider for your policy:

Trend Adjustment (TA)
The idea behind trend adjustment is very simple. Technology, genetics and farming practices improve drastically in a short time. The TA endorsement takes your yield from prior production, multiplies the year by a factor the Risk Management Agency (RMA) provides, and adds it to the yield from that year. This can be done on up to 20 years of production on a unit. For example, if you grew 150-bushel corn in 2012 and the TA factor is 1.5, the formula would be: ((2022 - 2012) x 1.5) + 150 = 165 bushels. So, by adding TA, this grower added 15 bushels to the yield for 2012, increasing the approved yield for that unit.

Yield Exclusion (YE)
Have you ever had a year you just wanted to forget? This exclusion was introduced for such years, whether caused by drought, flood or one of the thousands of variables growers face every year. YE will remove a year that the RMA deemed excludable for reasons of extreme circumstances. For example, corn grown in 2012 is excludable for most counties in Missouri. Removing the challenging year from actual production history will increase the approved yield for the unit.

Prevent Plant + 5% (PF)
PF is simple. By paying for small premium increase (usually less than $1 per acre), growers can increase the percentage of payment on a prevent plant from 55% to 60%. For example, in 2022, if you prevent-planted corn with a guaranteed yield of 150 bushels, you would have been paid almost $45 per acre more than at the 55% level (using spring corn price of $5.90). This endorsement is not a fit for every operation but is especially useful for flood-prone ground. In addition, PF can also be elected on one crop and not the other on a policy.
 All these endorsements do impact premium. However, these implications are not charges for the endorsements. Rather, the endorsement is increasing a grower’s guarantee and thus increases the premium.
Visit mfa-inc.com/cropinsurance to find a MFA Crop Insurance agent near you if you have any questions.

Double-crop soybeans insurable by written agreement

The USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) has announced a new “streamlined process” to insure double-crop soybeans through a written agreement.

According to USDA, the expanded coverage is an effort to reduce the economic risk of raising two crops on the same land in one year, helping U.S. farmers to increase food supply and lower food costs for American families. 

While the “following another crop” practice was already insurable in some areas, this new initiative expands insurability and makes it easier to insure a second crop where previously unavailable.

Taylor Gilmore, MFA area crop insurance agent, said producers must act fast if they are interested in the double-crop insurance opportunity.

“A written agreement is a request sent to RMA to modify existing terms and conditions for crop insurance,” Gilmore said. “The process for this needs to begin before the first of the year to allow time to get the required documents and information together and sent off to the RMA.”

Once the request has been sent, RMA will reply with an offer, which will include approval or disapproval of the request, the rate, conditions, production guarantee, etc. If the request is approved, then the producer can decide to decline or accept the offer.

The RMA has not, however, released any details on how “streamlined” these agreements will be regarding double-crop soybeans. Gilmore said agents hope to know more before the end of 2022. 

Reach out to an MFA Crop Insurance agent to learn more details, just visit mfa-inc.com/cropinsurance.

New agent serves eastern Missouri

Taylor Gilmore has joined the MFA team as a crop insurance agent for the eastern side of Missouri, including Districts 3, 6 and 10.

TaylorTaylor has been in the insurance business for five years and recently made the switch to crop insurance. A native of Ashland, Mo., she and her husband, Matt, have a 3-year-old son, Weston. Taylor grew up competing in rodeo, eventually focusing solely on barrel racing. She and Matt now raise cattle and crops and still make time to ride horses with family and friends.

Taylor’s experience in insurance and on the farm makes her a welcomed member of our team.
For crop or livestock insurance needs in eastern Missouri, western Illinois and northeastern Arkansas, Taylor can be reached at (573) 476-7440 or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Read more in this Dec/Jan2023 issue of Today’s Farmer


  • Created on .
  • Hits: 129

In this Dec 2022 / Jan 2023

Cracking open markets for Missouri pecans
The Show-Me State’s sweet, native nuts have much to offer—no matter how you say it

by Jessica Ekern

Victory in Indy
Missouri FFA members earn top awards at the FFA national convention

by Allison Jenkins

Back to work
Returning CRP ground to agricultural production takes careful consideration

by Allison Jenkins

The little things count

Make sure you have the right endorsements on your crop insurance policy

by Blake Thomas

Feeding the future

Show Me Youth Ag Academy provides immersive education in livestock production

by Allison Jenkins

Doing our part with heart

MFA Charitable Foundation helps fund community projects that support agriculture, education and rural life

by Allison Jenkins

Losing crop protection tools challenges growers

We must seek alternative solutions when proven products can no longer be used

by Doug Spaunhorst

Waste not, want not when feeding hay

Storage, management practices can have significant impact on losses

by Dr. Jim White


Country Corner
Eight billion people and counting

by Allison Jenkins


Ramping up research
MFA is new sponsor of Missouri High School Rodeo
Dairy dominance

Markets - as printed in the magazine
Corn: Final crop estimates among price influences
Soybeans: Export sales remain strong
Cattle: Cattle inventory cycles lower
Wheat: Drought, late planting threaten U.S. crop

Recipes - as printed in the magazine
Recipes - website

Coconut season

BUY, sell, trade

Taking hold of an uncertain future

by Ernie Verslues

Closing Thought
Poem by Walter Bargen
Photo by Jessica Ekern

Flip book of the Dec/Jan 2022 Today's Farmer magazine
Click here or below to view the magazine as printed via a flip book.

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 342

Back to work

Returning CRP ground to agricultural production takes careful consideration

Coming out of retirement is never easy. There are financial implications. Concerns about health and well-being. Questions about productivity and capabilities.

Those same considerations apply when Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land is returned to agricultural production. The purpose of the program, which was established by Congress in 1985, is to address erosion, water quality and wildlife habitat loss on environmentally sensitive ground. Landowners take eligible acreage out of production for 10 to 15 years at a time and receive annual rental payments in return.

However, high commodity prices, lower supplies and strong demand in recent years are incentivizing producers to put these retired acres back to work. And that trend is causing concern among conservationists who don’t want to see decades of land improvement go down the drain.

“There are a lot of expiring CRP acres going into row crops because we’ve got $7 corn and $15 soybeans. From a conservation standpoint, it’s kind of tough to swallow,” said Landry Jones, MFA conservation grazing specialist. “We know there’s a reason that land was put in CRP in the ’80s and ’90s, usually because it was highly erodible or not productive. All farmers are in this business to be profitable, but they’re also in it to leave a legacy for the next generation. That’s why producers really need to make informed decisions when it comes to farming those CRP acres.”

Missouri had 233,000 acres of CRP with contracts that expired Sept. 30 at the fiscal year-end for the USDA Farm Service Agency, which administers the program. The state was among the top five with the most expiring acres in 2022, leaving a total of 712,000. Over the next three years, another 170,000 acres are set to roll out of the program.

“That doesn’t mean all those acres will come out of CRP, but their contracts will expire, and they will likely either be re-enrolled or go into some form of production agriculture,” said Nate Goodrich, assistant state conservationist with the Natural Resources Conservation Service in Missouri. “The bottom dollar is what’s really going to count. If commodity prices continue to stay high, we’ll probably see more of these acres farmed. If CRP pencils out as the best way to go, we’ll see producers going that direction. But if I had a crystal ball to know for sure, I’d be a rich man.”

The program’s long-term contracts mean that many CRP parcels have been on hiatus for a decade or more, and preparing them for production is no simple matter. There is no cookie-cutter approach, Jones points out. Management decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the land’s past history and current condition. And renovations won’t happen overnight, he warned.

“To go from a CRP field to a highly productive row-crop field or pasture is a tough row to hoe without taking some proper steps,” Jones said. “It will take time. It’s important to have a good plan in place long before you plan on putting a seed in the ground.”

Goodrich encourages producers who are bringing land out of CRP to work with their local NRCS office to put together a conservation plan. There are couple of reasons for this advice, he added. First if they’re participating in other USDA programs, they have to stay in compliance with those requirements. Second, a conservation plan can open up opportunities with other Farm Bill programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) or Conservation Stewardship Program. These can provide financial assistance to install conservation practices or activities to further control soil erosion, provide wildlife habitat and increase soil health.

That’s exactly the approach Matt Graham took when he acquired expiring CRP ground adjacent to his family farm in Eagleville, Mo., just south of the Iowa border. Four years ago, he purchased 30 acres from a neighbor who had enrolled the parcel in CRP in the late 1980s. The current contract expired Oct. 1. Graham plans to keep the land in grass to expand his beef operation.

“I feel pretty lucky that we were able to get this,” Graham said. “My neighbor had already been approached by other farmers who were going to pay him more than $100 an acre to rent it for row crops. That’s what I’m competing with. If you’re just running cows, it’s pretty tough to make that work.”

Graham, an agricultural engineer by trade, moved back home six years ago to this Century Farm, which was established by his maternal grandmother’s family. He and his wife, Amanda, and their sons, Kolton, 16, and Lane, 14, raise Angus-shorthorn cattle and recently added Wagyu to the operation. Graham’s father, Vince, also has his own beef operation up the road.

“My family’s been farming here since 1886,” Graham said. “That’s why I have a different view than some landowners. This ground is highly erodible and shouldn’t be farmed for crops. Running cattle on it is the best thing you could do. I want it to be here for my boys to continue to do it.”

Overall, the former CRP acreage wasn’t in bad shape when he took over, Graham said. To prepare it for grazing, he’s been controlling weeds, installing cross-fencing and putting in watering stations. He’s also been collaborating with Adam Jones, MFA conservation specialist, to grid sample the land and put together a nutrient management plan for NRCS, which is providing financial assistance through the EQIP program to build a winter-feeding facility.

“Right now, I’m just feeding in hay rings, and the ground gets pretty torn up,” Graham said. “NRCS is going to help cost-share the barn, so I’ll be able to feed in there during the winter and push all my manure into a pit and then eventually spread it across the pasture.”

While keeping expired CRP land in grass is preferred in most cases, Goodrich said, there are ways to return the acres to row-crop production in an environmentally responsible manner.

“A good system we like to see is incorporating no-till or reduced tillage prior to planting the crops as well as cover crops in between to control erosion and increase soil health,” he said. “NRCS also encourages structural practices, when and where needed, that could include terraces throughout the field or grass waterways in the concentrated flow areas. Growers might need to do a combination of both management and structural practices to really keep the erosion where we’d like to see it and to make them eligible for USDA programs.”

When it comes to such programs, Goodrich said NRCS will work with landowners and farmers to find the best fit. With the influx of federal climate-smart funding, there are even more opportunities than ever before, he added.

“That’s part of the job of our soil conservationists, to work with those producers to find the best program for what they want to do,” he said. “There are a lot of different options out there. We can help them find the best route to get them where they want to go.”

A brand-new opportunity, just announced in mid-November, is the EQIP Native Forages Initiative. This program is targeted to producers who want to convert non-native forages or cropland to native forages for haying or grazing. Expiring CRP ground could be eligible for this initiative, Goodrich said.

“This program was prompted by the drought, which caused folks to lose a lot of grass or pastureland,” he explained. “We’re trying to incentivize them to establish some warm-season grasses into their grazing operations so they will have something that’s going to respond during the hot, dry months. It’s a little bit different than our traditional EQIP program in that we are able to turn these around very quickly without having to go through a ranking and batching period like we do with our traditional programs.”

As for CRP, shifting conservation and environmental priorities and commodity price cycles will likely shape its future in the next farm bill debate, but Jones said he believes it will continue to play an important role in government-funded conservation programs.

“I think CRP is always going to have its place because it comes with that annual rental payment,” he said. “Just having that 10- or 15-year guaranteed annual income is meaningful for some of these marginal lands. It goes back to stewardship, which is one of MFA’s core values. Making decisions with stewardship in mind isn’t always the easiest thing to do, but it’s the right thing to do.”

For more information on transitioning CRP acres or other conservation opportunities, contact your local NRCS office or MFA affiliate or email Landry Jones at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. 

Read more in this Dec/Jan2023 issue of Today’s Farmer


  • Created on .
  • Hits: 812

About Today's Farmer magazine

Today's Farmer is published 9 times annually. Printed issues arrive monthly except combined issues for June/July, August/September and December/January. Subscriptions are available only in the United States.

If you would like to begin or renew a print subscription, CLICK HERE and go to our shop. We are proud to offer the subscription for only $15 per year.

 ©2023 MFA Incorporated.

Connect with us.